beer.jpg
I_love_pope.jpg
Amy Proctor

amyp1.jpg

Archives
Terrorism Has No Religion
Terrorism Has No Religion_sm_logo.jpg

Stats

   





SEARCH THIS SITE


Site RSS Feeds
  Subscribe to Amy Proctor's RSS Feed
Media

My Point Radio - April 2, 2007
  -Amy interviewed by Dave and Jenn

P.V.Radio -March 28, 2007
  -Amy interviewed by Frank and Shane

MONTEL WILLIAMS - October 12, 2006

With CNN’s Lou Dobbs, “Rev” Jesse Jackson, Tony Goldwyn, Amy Holmes, Asra Nomani and Iman Feisal Abdul Rauf

…………………….

W.A.R RADIO - July 4, 2006 

…………………….

Message to Greenlawn Baptist Church - July 2, 2006

…………………….

CBS RADIO 550 KTSA - June 13, 2006

…………………….

CINDY SHEEHAN RALLY - Sept. 15, 2005

Video: (Amy interviewed)


News Articles: (Amy interviewed)

Pope Pius XII
Reenforcements

Vatican_button.jpg
I'm a friend of Israel

aragorn.jpg

Promos
TravelChannel1.jpg

Powered by Squarespace
Recent Comments


Israeli Comrades
NObama Bloggers



Victory Caucus
victorycaucuslogo_Thumb.gif
Stop the ACLU Blogburst
Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting

The Truth Surge
truthsurge
Bloggers united to combat the media bias on Iraq

 
GOP Bloggers
gopblog.jpg
Blue Star Blogs

IKA
Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting
War Against Terror
101st Fighting Keyboardists
« The Vampire Strikes Back | Main | Budget Deficit Drops to $296 Billion »
Tuesday
11Jul

Robert Novak Reveals Sources for Plame "Outing"

*Scroll down for updates*

 

Syndicated columnist Robert D. Novak revealed today the names of the three sources responsible for the Valerie Plame outing. Guess who one is:  Joe Wilson, Plame’s hubby.  Here is Novak’s article.

My Role in the Valerie Plame Leak Story

Special Prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald has informed my attorneys that, after two and one-half years, his investigation of the CIA leak case concerning matters directly relating to me has been concluded. That frees me to reveal my role in the federal inquiry that, at the request of Fitzgerald, I have kept secret.

I have cooperated in the investigation while trying to protect journalistic privileges under the First Amendment and shield sources who have not revealed themselves. I have been subpoenaed by and testified to a federal grand jury. Published reports that I took the Fifth Amendment, made a plea bargain with the prosecutors or was a prosecutorial target were all untrue.

For nearly the entire time of his investigation, Fitzgerald knew — independent of me — the identity of the sources I used in my column of July 14, 2003. A federal investigation was triggered when I reported that former Ambassador Joseph Wilson’s wife, Valerie Plame Wilson, was employed by the CIA and helped initiate his 2002 mission to Niger. That Fitzgerald did not indict any of these sources may indicate his conclusion that none of them violated the Intelligence Identities Protection Act.

Some journalists have badgered me to disclose my role in the case, even demanding I reveal my sources — identified in the column as two senior Bush administration officials and an unspecified CIA source. I have promised to discuss my role in the investigation when permitted by the prosecution, and I do so now.

The news broke Sept. 26, 2003, that the Justice Department was investigating the CIA leak case. I contacted my longtime attorney, Lester Hyman, who brought his partner at Swidler Berlin, James Hamilton, into the case. Hamilton urged me not to comment publicly on the case, and I have followed that advice for the most part.

The FBI soon asked to interview me, prompting my first major decision. My attorneys advised me that I had no certain constitutional basis to refuse cooperation if subpoenaed by a grand jury. To do so would make me subject to imprisonment and inevitably result in court decisions that would diminish press freedom, all at heavy personal legal costs.

I was interrogated at the Swidler Berlin offices Oct. 7, 2003, by an FBI inspector and two agents. I had not identified my sources to my attorneys, and I told them I would not reveal them to the FBI. I did disclose how Valerie Wilson’s role was reported to me, but the FBI did not press me to disclose my sources.

On Dec. 30, 2003, the Justice Department named Fitzgerald as special prosecutor. An appointment was made for Fitzgerald to interview me at Swidler Berlin on Jan. 14, 2004. The problem facing me was that the special prosecutor had obtained signed waivers from every official who might have given me information about Wilson’s wife.

That created a dilemma. I did not believe blanket waivers in any way relieved me of my journalistic responsibility to protect a source. Hamilton told me that I was sure to lose a case in the courts at great expense. Nevertheless, I still felt I could not reveal their names.

However, on Jan. 12, two days before my meeting with Fitzgerald, the special prosecutor informed Hamilton that he would be bringing to the Swidler Berlin offices only two waivers. One was by my principal source in the Valerie Wilson column, a source whose name has not yet been revealed. The other was by presidential adviser Karl Rove, whom I interpret as confirming my primary source’s information. In other words, the special prosecutor knew the names of my sources.

When Fitzgerald arrived, he had a third waiver in hand — from Bill Harlow, the CIA public information officer who was my CIA source for the column confirming Mrs. Wilson’s identity. I answered questions using the names of Rove, Harlow and my primary source.

I had a second session with Fitzgerald at Swidler Berlin on Feb. 5, 2004, after which I was subpoenaed to appear before the grand jury. I testified there at the U.S. courthouse in Washington on Feb. 25.

In these four appearances with federal authorities, I declined to answer when the questioning touched on matters beyond the CIA leak case. Neither the FBI nor the special prosecutor pressed me.

I have revealed Rove’s name because his attorney has divulged the substance of our conversation, though in a form different from my recollection. I have revealed Harlow’s name because he has publicly disclosed his version of our conversation, which also differs from my recollection. My primary source has not come forward to identify himself.

When I testified before the grand jury, I was permitted to read a statement that I had written expressing my discomfort at disclosing confidential conversations with news sources. It should be remembered that the special prosecutor knew their identities and did not learn them from me.

In my sworn testimony, I said what I have contended in my columns and on television: Joe Wilson’s wife’s role in instituting her husband’s mission was revealed to me in the middle of a long interview with an official who I have previously said was not a political gunslinger. After the federal investigation was announced, he told me through a third party that the disclosure was inadvertent on his part.

Following my interview with the primary source, I sought out the second administration official and the CIA spokesman for confirmation. I learned Valerie Plame’s name from Joe Wilson’s entry in “Who’s Who in America.”

I considered his wife’s role in initiating Wilson’s mission, later confirmed by the Senate Intelligence Committee, to be a previously undisclosed part of an important news story. I reported it on that basis. 
 
The three sources who told Novak of Plame’s identity were:

 
1) a still unidentified source, which Novak calls “my primary source”, thought to be Richard Armitage.  Armitage was the 13th United States Deputy Secretary of State from 2001 to 2005, and the second-in-command at the State Department. 
2)  Bill Harlow, the CIA public information officer who was Novak’s CIA source for the column confirming Mrs. Wilson’s identity.
3)  Joe Wilson, Valerie Plame’s husband, from Joe Wilson’s entry in “Who’s Who in America.” (below)

who'swho.jpg
“Copyright (c) 2002 by Reed Elsevier, Inc.”



RELATED POSTS:


Others blogging this story:


Trackback URL:
http://amyproctor.squarespace.com/blog/trackback/583741   


PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

References (4)

References allow you to track sources for this article, as well as articles that were written in response to this article.
  • Response
    No surprises here. What is interesting is the "primary source". However, it is clear from the onset that Joe Wilson outed his wife himself, although she was an analyst working 9-5 at Langley. Even if she were covert at one time, surely her previous w...
  • Response
    Correct Post Address... sorry.No surprises here. What is interesting is the "primary source". However, it is clear from the onset that Joe Wilson outed his wife himself, although she was an analyst working 9-5 at Langley. Even if she were covert ...
  • Response
    Great words in defense of a great business. So where were such words in defense of Bob Novak?
  • Response
    No surprises here. What is interesting is the "primary source". However, it is clear from the onset that Joe Wilson outed his wife himself, although she was an analyst working 9-5 at Langley. Even if she were covert at one time, surely her previous w...

Reader Comments (22)

A grand jury convened over a Who's Who entry.
July 12, 2006 | Unregistered CommenterJ Rob
And Wilson paid for the listing in the sham "Who's Who". What a crock!

I have other comments over at my blog.

Good point, Rob.
July 12, 2006 | Unregistered CommenterMax
Rob that is why after awhile it got the name the "Plame Game"
July 12, 2006 | Unregistered CommenterPhil
Amy:

Third time was the charm. Aubrey's suggestion worked!
July 12, 2006 | Unregistered CommenterMax
we wish you a merry Fitzmas
We wish you a merry Fitzmas
We wish you a merry Fitzmas
Go cry in your beer
July 12, 2006 | Unregistered CommenterJ Rob
What gets me is that no one other than Novak thought to look up Joe Wilson in "Who's Who In America". This should've been a complete laughingstock for everyone, not just the reality-based community.
July 12, 2006 | Unregistered CommenterJabba the Tutt
Thanks for this thorough post.
July 13, 2006 | Unregistered Commenterchrys
Good post Amy. I just wonder when the treasonous heathens in our media will start to be put to death?
July 13, 2006 | Unregistered CommenterTim
Hi Amy,

Keep up the good work.

Regards...
July 13, 2006 | Registered CommenterHawkeye
So where exactly does it say in the Who's Who listing that Valerie Plame is a CIA agent? That is the whole crux of the investigation. Anyone could have figured out who Joe Wilson's wife was, that isn't the issue, it's the fact that Novak outed her as an agent for the CIA and that those in the White House confirmed that fact.
July 13, 2006 | Unregistered Commentersdmoderate
sdmoderate, it has been known for years that Joe Wilson, a former US embassador, was married to a CIA agent. When Wilson allowed Plame's name to appear under his description as his wife, the cat was out of the bag.
July 13, 2006 | Unregistered CommenterAmy Proctor
See, SDmoderate is a prime example. They are deliberately obtuse about anything where they are shown the lies. This will be another situation where the lies have been told over and over again by the media and Democrat machine. The lie is entrenched.
July 13, 2006 | Unregistered Commentertoni
Sdmoderate is correct. And please explain to me WHY it's perfectly fine for Robert Novak to print a story about Brewster Jennings.

Do you right wingers know what Brewster Jennings was?

Let me enlighten you:

>>>"Brewster Jennings & Associates was a front company set up in the mid-1990s by the CIA for Valerie Plame, a classified status employee for the Agency whose identity may have been disclosed for political retaliation."

And more:

>>>"Compounding the damage, the front company, Brewster-Jennings & Associates, the name of which has been reported previously, apparently also was used by other CIA officers whose work now could be at risk, according to Vince Cannistraro, former CIA chief of counterterrorism operations and analysis. Now, Plame's career as a covert operations officer in the CIA's Directorate of Operations is over. Those she dealt with -- on business or not -- may be in danger. The directorate is conducting an extensive damage assessment. And Plame's exposure may make it harder for American spies to persuade foreigners to share important secrets with them, U.S. intelligence officials said."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brewster_Jennings_&_Associates

And why was the work of Brewster Jennings & Associates important and relevant?

>>>"On Chris Matthews' Hardball Monday evening, just moments ago, MSNBC correspondent David Shuster confirmed what RAW STORY first reported in February: that outed CIA officer Valerie Plame Wilson was working on Iran at the time she was outed (Watch the video of Shuster's report here).

RAW STORY's Larisa Alexandrovna broke the story earlier this year, which went unnoticed by the mainstream media (Read our full story).

According to current and former intelligence officials, Plame Wilson, who worked on the clandestine side of the CIA in the Directorate of Operations as a non-official cover (NOC) officer, was part of an operation tracking distribution and acquisition of weapons of mass destruction technology to and from Iran.

Reports Shuster in this rush transcript: "INTELLIGENCE SOURCES SAY VALERIE WILSON WAS PART OF AN OPERATION THREE YEARS AGO TRACKING THE PROLIFERATION OF NUCLEAR WEAPONS MATERIAL INTO IRAN. AND THE SOURCES ALLEGE THAT WHEN MRS. WILSON'S COVER WAS BLOWN, THE ADMINISTRATION'S ABILITY TO TRACK IRAN'S NUCLEAR AMBITIONS WAS DAMAGED AS WELL."

http://www.rawstory.com/news/2006/MSNBC_confirms_Raw_Story_report_Outed_0501.html

So go ahead, Bush-bunnies. Proclaim a "victory" that a CIA operation tracking Iran's nuke program was destoyed. Show me where your true loyalties lie. Apparently it's with the GOP, and not the security of America.

--Cobra
July 13, 2006 | Unregistered CommenterCobra
Wikipedia and Rawstory?

Bwah-hahahah ... too funny. Yeah, I believe wikipedia as much as you believe Carl Rove or George Bush!

Get better sources, please. ANND, Chris Matthews from SOFTBALL!!!! You think we are that gullible? Not.
July 13, 2006 | Unregistered CommenterFix4RSO